Google Chrome

Discuss any other topics here
User avatar
jonas
Posts: 779
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 5:43 pm
Location: Texas, USA
Contact:

Google Chrome

Post by jonas »

Has anyone checked out the new Google Chrome web browser? It seems its based off of firefox. Also it has seperate threads or processes for every tab. It seems faster then firefox too. But that's not really to big of a suprise seeing as google has access to many cached websites so they are able to test many websites with it before ever releasing it to the public. What do you guys think?

[edit]Just seen in another thread that i'm not the only one that spotted it.
Jonas

Focused, hard work is the real key to success. Keep your eyes on the goal, and just keep taking the next step towards completing it. If you aren't sure which way to do something, do it both ways and see which works better. - John Carmack
User avatar
Trougedoor122
Posts: 224
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 5:59 am
Location: Michigan, USA
Contact:

Re: Google Chrome

Post by Trougedoor122 »

it looks okay but i like FF better.
User avatar
jonas
Posts: 779
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 5:43 pm
Location: Texas, USA
Contact:

Re: Google Chrome

Post by jonas »

I love firefox... But it crashes too much when watching lots of videos. I've also seen it taking up to 300 some meg of memory, when I've already closed out videos. It has poor memory management. If they will adapt some of the background technology google chrome is using, maybe not the look. I think firefox would be a lot better. Firefox is quick. Chrome is twice as quick.
Jonas

Focused, hard work is the real key to success. Keep your eyes on the goal, and just keep taking the next step towards completing it. If you aren't sure which way to do something, do it both ways and see which works better. - John Carmack
User avatar
Destron
Posts: 520
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 7:30 pm

Re: Google Chrome

Post by Destron »

I would be using Chrome right now if it weren't for Firefox's extension system. I love my Adblock Plus and Downthemall, and couldn't bear to part with them.
User avatar
sankha93
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:58 pm
Location: India
Contact:

Re: Google Chrome

Post by sankha93 »

By the way I had already posted about Chrome. Anyway, Chrome is good but FF is better.
sankha93
Matte
Posts: 321
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 7:49 pm

Re: Google Chrome

Post by Matte »

I think Chrome's faster than FF2, but it has a leak, that can autodownload malware to your computer. So I'm gonna wait for the full version.
User avatar
Trougedoor122
Posts: 224
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 5:59 am
Location: Michigan, USA
Contact:

Re: Google Chrome

Post by Trougedoor122 »

Matte wrote:I think Chrome's faster than FF2, but it has a leak, that can autodownload malware to your computer. So I'm gonna wait for the full version.
use firefox 3 it better
elnawe
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:12 pm

Re: Google Chrome

Post by elnawe »

Google Chrome have some bugs.
FF3 is better.
User avatar
jonas
Posts: 779
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 5:43 pm
Location: Texas, USA
Contact:

Re: Google Chrome

Post by jonas »

sankha93 wrote:By the way I had already posted about Chrome. Anyway, Chrome is good but FF is better.
Yeah sorry about that man. I posted then I saw you mention about it in the browsers post.
Matte wrote:I think Chrome's faster than FF2, but it has a leak, that can autodownload malware to your computer. So I'm gonna wait for the full version.
Wow that's not good. I think the whole deal with the java virtual machine is a good idea as well as separate processes. I'd like to see some of that in firefox. I think it would relieve some of the memory hog issues.
Jonas

Focused, hard work is the real key to success. Keep your eyes on the goal, and just keep taking the next step towards completing it. If you aren't sure which way to do something, do it both ways and see which works better. - John Carmack
Matte
Posts: 321
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 7:49 pm

Re: Google Chrome

Post by Matte »

jonas wrote:
sankha93 wrote:By the way I had already posted about Chrome. Anyway, Chrome is good but FF is better.
Yeah sorry about that man. I posted then I saw you mention about it in the browsers post.
Matte wrote:I think Chrome's faster than FF2, but it has a leak, that can autodownload malware to your computer. So I'm gonna wait for the full version.
Wow that's not good. I think the whole deal with the java virtual machine is a good idea as well as separate processes. I'd like to see some of that in firefox. I think it would relieve some of the memory hog issues.
I've heard that Apple's browser Safari had that problem too, in the beginning. But they fixed it quite fast. I hope Google does it too.
User avatar
jonas
Posts: 779
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 5:43 pm
Location: Texas, USA
Contact:

Re: Google Chrome

Post by jonas »

That's very true. I remember seeing an article about the major bug with safari. You'd think they would have fixed this before release, but oh well. They still haven't released a version for linux so I haven't got to try this out yet... :(
Jonas

Focused, hard work is the real key to success. Keep your eyes on the goal, and just keep taking the next step towards completing it. If you aren't sure which way to do something, do it both ways and see which works better. - John Carmack
lprd2007
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 8:15 pm

Post by lprd2007 »

I've used Chrome at least for two months but now i still am using Firefox. Chrome is really fast with basic HTML pages, but when u use youtube or another web page that uses flash Chrome crashes. I don't know if there's a fix of this, but for now Chrome is not an alternative.
Matte
Posts: 321
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 7:49 pm

Re: Google Chrome

Post by Matte »

It's not that bad! I'm using it right now, and I guess you all know these Javascript alert spammer website (which I just made one myself :)), and you can choose that the website doesn't display them anymore. Very handy. I have to find a way through the interface though. I'll write a small review about it.
dylanwinn
Posts: 84
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 6:15 am

Re: Google Chrome

Post by dylanwinn »

jonas wrote:I love firefox... But it crashes too much when watching lots of videos. I've also seen it taking up to 300 some meg of memory, when I've already closed out videos. It has poor memory management. If they will adapt some of the background technology google chrome is using, maybe not the look. I think firefox would be a lot better. Firefox is quick. Chrome is twice as quick.

Update to the latest version of flash to solve the video playback crashes. Also, 300 mb of ram isn't much
Matte
Posts: 321
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 7:49 pm

Re: Google Chrome

Post by Matte »

dylanwinn wrote:
jonas wrote:I love firefox... But it crashes too much when watching lots of videos. I've also seen it taking up to 300 some meg of memory, when I've already closed out videos. It has poor memory management. If they will adapt some of the background technology google chrome is using, maybe not the look. I think firefox would be a lot better. Firefox is quick. Chrome is twice as quick.

Update to the latest version of flash to solve the video playback crashes. Also, 300 mb of ram isn't much
It is, when you have only 512 megs, like me.
Post Reply