True Existance. getting back on track

Game Design, Story, Game Play.

Should I revamp the whole project like another HalfLife or should I first build som prototype demos.

REVAMP, Some things that should work don't, and there interfering with progress.
0
No votes
PROTOTYPE, I wan't to see some demos, So what if they don't work very well. Give me an Idea of how this is going to play.
4
100%
 
Total votes: 4

User avatar
fps
Posts: 504
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:54 pm
Location: in a magical land devoid of hope, happiness, and sanity.

True Existance. getting back on track

Post by fps »

I am not releasing the name or the plot quite yet, but i will tell you that its big, complicated, intricate, and otherwise a very large project.
it took me 4 years of messing around with rf to gain some focus and now i have some screenshots for you.
I really like the plot. ive always been a good story teller and i really think that this is the most moving story i could write for a game in rf.
for one thing, the plot is origional and to a great degree. even if the action is mostly the same as many shooters.
i really am working on my presentation of the story because it is so deep that i could probably ruin it with poor presentation and game play.
the levels are also giving me trouble, as they are complex but need to run smoothly. any ideas on what could help there.
as you will notice, these are WIP shots and some models need to have their origins fixed. These shots arent exactly up to date ethier so.... there... you .. go i guess. :? i think thats everything. i hope these post.
thanks,
fps

damn, i cant get get them to post on the message itself.
wahst the code for that.
I'll attach them for now. enjoy
Attachments
screen000.JPG
(87.17 KiB) Downloaded 72 times
screen001.JPG
(63.37 KiB) Downloaded 73 times
screen002.JPG
there is a third pic but i cant upload
(76.12 KiB) Downloaded 123 times
Last edited by fps on Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:31 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Ryan
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 5:31 am
Location: Tucson Arizona

Post by Ryan »

Looks awesome dude, one suggestion, the last picture looks like its ground textures to big to scale. I would try making that texture a little smaller
Those who have all the answers, are never up to date on the questions.
User avatar
fps
Posts: 504
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:54 pm
Location: in a magical land devoid of hope, happiness, and sanity.

Post by fps »

i dont understand what you mean by "to big to scale.".
do you mean too large to use image scaling in the level editor, or do you mean that the image is simply too large scale?
i used that photorealistic pack so many of the textures were pretty large.
are large textures or small textures better. do you know which one would make my levels look better?

thanks for you imput,
fps
User avatar
darksmaster923
Posts: 1857
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 10:32 pm
Location: Huntington Beach, California, USA

Post by darksmaster923 »

did you make the guns urself or?
Herp derp.
Ryan
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 5:31 am
Location: Tucson Arizona

Post by Ryan »

fps wrote:i dont understand what you mean by "to big to scale.".
do you mean too large to use image scaling in the level editor, or do you mean that the image is simply too large scale?
i used that photorealistic pack so many of the textures were pretty large.
are large textures or small textures better. do you know which one would make my levels look better?

thanks for you imput,
fps
No I just meant you could use the "pagedown" texture resizing in RF to make the textures a bit more to scale. The rocks and ground look like they are much larger then they should be. At least to my eys.... :?:
Looks good besides though! Awesome weps!
Those who have all the answers, are never up to date on the questions.
User avatar
Juutis
Posts: 1511
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 12:46 pm
Location: Finland

Post by Juutis »

Great work! Finally something about your big secret project! I've been waiting for this. :)

I agree that you could scale some of the textures down a bit. The ground texture as Ryan already said, and somehow the texture of the tower looks weird. Maybe scaling it down would make it look better. Anyway, nice job there. Keep it up. :D

The weapons look a little counter-strikish. Excellent work, if you made them yourself. They're a bit dark, though.
Pain is only psychological.
User avatar
fps
Posts: 504
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:54 pm
Location: in a magical land devoid of hope, happiness, and sanity.

Post by fps »

the textures are mostly in place as place holders untill i can get my hands on a better ones.
some of the weapons in the game are mine but the ones here are from places like fps banana, "the specialists" and such. i did mostly the animation bit but i am going to go back and redo them later.
they look a bit dark here because i dont quite understand the good methods of lighting a level properly. yet. like i said WIP.

unfourtionatly there are a lot of things here that you cant capture with a screenshot. like the interactions with the enviroment and the sound work which i spent a long time working on.
same with different scripting elementts that are still buggered up so i dont even want to take screenshots of them.
User avatar
steven8
Posts: 1487
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:08 am
Location: Barberton, OH

Post by steven8 »

I didn't think that ground texture looks too big. It is so easy to downsize these textures, then they have no 'roughness'. I think things look really good, fps. The geometry looks really cool!! Keep it up. :D
Steve Dilworth - Resisting change since 1965!
User avatar
fps
Posts: 504
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:54 pm
Location: in a magical land devoid of hope, happiness, and sanity.

Post by fps »

thanks everybody. i am really pleased that you all like the shots. mabey ill do some more of the more interesting stuff.
i do have a question about geometry. my geometry is all made up of th standard prefab objects. is there a tool or somthing that will allow me to make more realistic gometric shapes that can actually be used in my game without causing major frame rate problems?
User avatar
steven8
Posts: 1487
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:08 am
Location: Barberton, OH

Post by steven8 »

fps wrote:thanks everybody. i am really pleased that you all like the shots. mabey ill do some more of the more interesting stuff.
i do have a question about geometry. my geometry is all made up of th standard prefab objects. is there a tool or somthing that will allow me to make more realistic gometric shapes that can actually be used in my game without causing major frame rate problems?
You can model in Milkshape to create staticmeshentities, but they will just be static. For geometry to walk in and so forth, you need to make in one of our editors.

Well, let me add to that, that staticmeshmesh enities can be interacted with. Pushed and such, but you can't make buildings the player can enter.
Steve Dilworth - Resisting change since 1965!
User avatar
darksmaster923
Posts: 1857
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 10:32 pm
Location: Huntington Beach, California, USA

Post by darksmaster923 »

it looks like a magical game with sweet and tasty wonders inside!
Herp derp.
User avatar
bernie
RF Moderator
Posts: 1249
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:07 am
Location: Ireland

Post by bernie »

You can model in Milkshape to create staticmeshentities, but they will just be static. For geometry to walk in and so forth, you need to make in one of our editors.

Well, let me add to that, that staticmeshmesh enities can be interacted with. Pushed and such, but you can't make buildings the player can enter.
But you can make models of buildings and use them as static entity proxy. Make them no collision and build the collision using clip brushes (only use the ones you actually need) . You can then enter the building. You get faster frame rate and graphics using this method. I use this method for my pub, church and cottage in my game. It's been done before by someone on this forum but I can't remember who.
User avatar
steven8
Posts: 1487
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:08 am
Location: Barberton, OH

Post by steven8 »

bernie wrote:
You can model in Milkshape to create staticmeshentities, but they will just be static. For geometry to walk in and so forth, you need to make in one of our editors.

Well, let me add to that, that staticmeshmesh enities can be interacted with. Pushed and such, but you can't make buildings the player can enter.
But you can make models of buildings and use them as static entity proxy. Make them no collision and build the collision using clip brushes (only use the ones you actually need) . You can then enter the building. You get faster frame rate and graphics using this method. I use this method for my pub, church and cottage in my game. It's been done before by someone on this forum but I can't remember who.
Most excellent bernie. I hadn't thought of that. There you go. . .that's many heads put together!!
Steve Dilworth - Resisting change since 1965!
User avatar
bernie
RF Moderator
Posts: 1249
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:07 am
Location: Ireland

Post by bernie »

Yeah I just remembered who it was ... Tabulanis see this thread:
http://www.realityfactory.info/forum/vi ... ight=#5496
He was an absolute whizz with textures. I wonder what happened to him?
User avatar
fps
Posts: 504
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:54 pm
Location: in a magical land devoid of hope, happiness, and sanity.

Post by fps »

will it be difficult to model the buildings structure inthe level editor considering i will be doing it inside the stactic entity?
this sounds like a really great idea but i might have a problem though.
everytime i try to add a static entity (i tried a fire hydrant) it crashes my level after i compile. then i have to hide the actor somewere else before i can reopen my level. what could i be doing wrong.
any ideas.

thanks,
fps
Post Reply